Dementia Panel
In addition, it also includes the maternally inherited mitochondrial genome.
Is ideal for patients with a clinical suspicion of dementia.
- PLUS
Summary
The Blueprint Genetics Dementia Panel (test code NE2301):
Read about our accreditations, certifications and CE-marked IVD medical devices here.
ICD Codes
Refer to the most current version of ICD-10-CM manual for a complete list of ICD-10 codes.
Sample Requirements
- Blood (min. 1ml) in an EDTA tube
- Extracted DNA, min. 2 μg in TE buffer or equivalent
- Saliva (Please see Sample Requirements for accepted saliva kits)
Label the sample tube with your patient’s name, date of birth and the date of sample collection.
We do not accept DNA samples isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. In addition, if the patient is affected with a hematological malignancy, DNA extracted from a non-hematological source (e.g. skin fibroblasts) is strongly recommended.
Please note that, in rare cases, mitochondrial genome (mtDNA) variants may not be detectable in blood or saliva in which case DNA extracted from post-mitotic tissue such as skeletal muscle may be a better option.
Read more about our sample requirements here.
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a clinically and pathologically heterogeneous group of non-Alzheimer dementias characterized by selective, progressive cortical atrophy involving the frontal or temporal lobes. FTD is substantially less common than Alzheimer’s disease, with estimates of population prevalence ranging from 4-5 per 100,000 before age 65. Age of onset is typically in the sixth decade of life. However, it may begin as early 30 or as late as the ninth decade. Approximately 20-50% of individuals with FTD have an affected first degree relative. FTD has a substantial genetic component, with an autosomal dominant or X-linked inheritance pattern. It is estimated that 10% of patients with FTD have a disease causing mutation in a single gene. The APOE E4 haplotype confers a significant risk for Alzheimer’s disease related dementia, especially in homozygous state. Therefore, this haplotype is reported from this panel, if detected in homozygous state.
Genes in the Dementia Panel and their clinical significance
To view complete table content, scroll horizontally.
| Gene | Associated phenotypes | Inheritance | ClinVar | HGMD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABCA7 | Alzheimer disease | AD | 1 | 139 |
| APOE | Sea-blue histiocyte disease, Dysbetalipoproteinemia, familial (Hyperlipoproteinemia), Lipoprotein glomerulopathy | AD/AR | 31 | 55 |
| APP | Alzheimer disease, Cerebral amyloid angiopathy | AD/AR | 18 | 100 |
| CHMP2B | Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, CHMP2B-related, Frontotemporal dementia | AD | 6 | 21 |
| CSF1R | Leukoencephalopathy, diffuse hereditary, with spheroids | AD/AR | 56 | 83 |
| FUS | Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Essential tremor | AD/AR | 22 | 111 |
| GRN | Frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP43 inclusions, GRN-related, Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis | AD/AR | 43 | 214 |
| MAPT | Pick disease, Frontotemporal dementia, Parkinson-dementia syndrome, Supranuclear palsy, progressive | AD/AR | 26 | 104 |
| MT-ATP6 | Neuropathy, ataxia, and retinitis pigmentosa, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy, Ataxia and polyneuropathy, adult-onset, Cardiomyopathy, infantile hypertrophic, Leigh syndrome, Striatonigral degeneration, infantile, mitochondrial | Mitochondrial | 19 | |
| MT-ATP8 | Cardiomyopathy, apical hypertrophic, and neuropathy, Cardiomyopathy, infantile hypertrophic | Mitochondrial | 4 | |
| MT-CO1 | Myoglobinuria, recurrent, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy, Sideroblastic anemia, Cytochrome C oxidase deficiency, Deafness, mitochondrial | Mitochondrial | 17 | |
| MT-CO2 | Cytochrome c oxidase deficiency | Mitochondrial | 8 | |
| MT-CO3 | Cytochrome c oxidase deficiency, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy | Mitochondrial | 9 | |
| MT-CYB | Mitochondrial | 69 | ||
| MT-ND1 | Mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy, Leber optic atrophy and dystonia | Mitochondrial | 21 | |
| MT-ND2 | Leber hereditary optic neuropathy, Mitochondrial complex I deficiency | Mitochondrial | 6 | |
| MT-ND3 | Leber optic atrophy and dystonia, Mitochondrial complex I deficiency | Mitochondrial | 7 | |
| MT-ND4 | Leber hereditary optic neuropathy, Leber optic atrophy and dystonia, Mitochondrial complex I deficiency | Mitochondrial | 11 | |
| MT-ND4L | Leber hereditary optic neuropathy | Mitochondrial | 2 | |
| MT-ND5 | Myoclonic epilepsy with ragged red fibers, Mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy, Mitochondrial complex I deficiency | Mitochondrial | 19 | |
| MT-ND6 | Mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes, Oncocytoma, Leber hereditary optic neuropathy, Leber optic atrophy and dystonia, Mitochondrial complex I deficiency | Mitochondrial | 16 | |
| MT-RNR1 | Deafness, mitochondrial | Mitochondrial | 3 | |
| MT-RNR2 | Chloramphenicol toxicity/resistance | Mitochondrial | 2 | |
| MT-TA | Mitochondrial | 4 | ||
| MT-TC | Mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes | Mitochondrial | 3 | |
| MT-TD | Mitochondrial | 1 | ||
| MT-TE | Diabetes-deafness syndrome, Mitochondrial myopathy, infantile, transient, Mitochondrial myopathy with diabetes | Mitochondrial | 5 | |
| MT-TF | Myoclonic epilepsy with ragged red fibers, Nephropathy, tubulointerstitial, Encephalopathy, mitochondrial, Epilepsy, mitochondrial, Myopathy, mitochondrial, Mitochondrial encephalomyopathy with lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes | Mitochondrial | 7 | |
| MT-TG | Mitochondrial | 3 | ||
| MT-TH | Mitochondrial | 4 | ||
| MT-TI | Mitochondrial | 7 | ||
| MT-TK | Myoclonic epilepsy with ragged red fibers, Leigh syndrome | Mitochondrial | 5 | |
| MT-TL1 | Cytochrome c oxidase deficiency, Myoclonic epilepsy with ragged red fibers, Mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes, Diabetes-deafness syndrome, Cyclic vomiting syndrome, SIDS, susceptibility to | Mitochondrial | 14 | |
| MT-TL2 | Mitochondrial multisystemic disorder, Progressive external ophthalmoplegia, Mitochondrial Myopathy, Mitochondrial encephalomyopathy with lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes | Mitochondrial | 5 | |
| MT-TM | Leigh syndrome, Mitochondrial multisystemic disorder | Mitochondrial | 1 | |
| MT-TN | Progressive external ophthalmoplegia, Mitochondrial multisystemic disorder | Mitochondrial | 3 | |
| MT-TP | Mitochondrial | 2 | ||
| MT-TQ | Mitochondrial multisystemic disorder | Mitochondrial | 2 | |
| MT-TR | Encephalopathy, mitochondrial | Mitochondrial | 2 | |
| MT-TS1 | Myoclonic epilepsy with ragged red fibers, Mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes | Mitochondrial | 10 | |
| MT-TS2 | Mitochondrial multisystemic disorder | Mitochondrial | 2 | |
| MT-TT | Mitochondrial | 5 | ||
| MT-TV | Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), Leigh syndrome, Mitochondrial multisystemic disorder, Mitochondrial encephalomyopathy with lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes | Mitochondrial | 3 | |
| MT-TW | Leigh syndrome, Myopathy, mitochondrial | Mitochondrial | 8 | |
| MT-TY | Mitochondrial multisystemic disorder | Mitochondrial | 4 | |
| PRNP | Dementia, Lewy body, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, Huntington disease-like, Gerstmann-Straussler disease, Spongiform encephalopathy with neuropsychiatric features, Insomnia, fatal familial | AD/AR | 26 | 104 |
| PSEN1 | Dementia, frontotemporal, Pick disease, Alzheimer disease | AD | 57 | 306 |
| PSEN2 | Peripartum/pregnancy-associated cardiomyopathy, Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), Alzheimer disease, 4 | AD | 9 | 60 |
| RNF216* | Cerebellar ataxia and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (Gordon Holmes syndrome) | AR | 10 | 14 |
| SIGMAR1 | Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Spinal muscular atrophy, distal, Frontotemporal lobar degeneration-motor neuron disease | AR | 6 | 14 |
| SNCA | Parkinson disease, Dementia with Lewy bodies | AD | 7 | 35 |
| SORL1 | Early-onset Alzheimer disease | AD | 3 | 134 |
| TARDBP* | Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis | AD | 20 | 69 |
| TREM2 | Nasu-Hakola disease, Early-onset dementia without bone cysts, Polycystic lipomembranous osteodysplasia with sclerosing leukoencephalopathy | AR | 14 | 48 |
| TUBA4A | Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 22 | AD | 6 | 13 |
| UBE3A* | Angelman syndrome | AD | 176 | 202 |
| UBQLN2 | Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis | XL | 5 | 31 |
| VCP | Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Inclusion body myopathy with early-onset Paget disease, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease | AD | 17 | 61 |
The gene has suboptimal coverage (means <90% of the gene’s target nucleotides are covered at >20x with mapping quality score (MQ>20) reads), and/or the gene has exons listed under Test limitations section that are not included in the panel as they are not sufficiently covered with high quality sequence reads.
Some, or all, of the gene is duplicated in the genome. Read more.
The sensitivity to detect variants may be limited in genes marked with an asterisk (*) or number sign (#). Due to possible limitations these genes may not be available as single gene tests.
Gene refers to the HGNC approved gene symbol; Inheritance refers to inheritance patterns such as autosomal dominant (AD), autosomal recessive (AR), mitochondrial (mi), X-linked (XL), X-linked dominant (XLD) and X-linked recessive (XLR); ClinVar refers to the number of variants in the gene classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic in this database (ClinVar); HGMD refers to the number of variants with possible disease association in the gene listed in Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD). The list of associated, gene specific phenotypes are generated from CGD or Mitomap databases.
Non-coding variants covered by Dementia Panel
To view complete table content, scroll horizontally.
| Gene | Genomic location HG19 | HGVS | RefSeq | RS-number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APP | Chr21:27253648 | c.*331_*332delAT | NM_000484.3 | |
| APP | Chr21:27543203 | c.-49+100C>A | NM_001136131.2 | |
| APP | Chr21:27543454 | c.-516C>G | NM_000484.3 | rs539645405 |
| APP | Chr21:27543619 | c.-681G>A | NM_000484.3 | rs187510057 |
| CSF1R | Chr5:149440654 | c.1859-119G>A | NM_005211.3 | |
| FUS | Chr16:31202807 | c.*48G>A | NM_004960.3 | rs376510148 |
| FUS | Chr16:31202818 | c.*59G>A | NM_004960.3 | |
| FUS | Chr16:31202863 | c.*105dupT | NM_004960.3 | |
| FUS | Chr16:31202867 | c.*108C>T | NM_004960.3 | rs780606789 |
| FUS | Chr16:31202869 | c.*110G>A | NM_004960.3 | |
| FUS | Chr16:31202891 | c.*132C>A | NM_004960.3 | rs565540429 |
| FUS | Chr16:31202949 | c.*190C>A | NM_004960.3 | |
| GRN | Chr17:42422701 | c.-9A>G | NM_002087.2 | |
| GRN | Chr17:42422705 | c.-8+3A>T | NM_002087.2 | rs63751020 |
| GRN | Chr17:42422705 | c.-8+3A>G | NM_002087.2 | |
| GRN | Chr17:42422707 | c.-8+5G>C | NM_002087.2 | rs63750313 |
| MAPT | Chr17:44087661 | c.1774-15T>C | NM_016835.4 | |
| MAPT | Chr17:44087779 | c.1866+11T>C | NM_016835.4 | rs63751394 |
| MAPT | Chr17:44087780 | c.1866+12C>T | NM_016835.4 | rs63750916 |
| MAPT | Chr17:44087781 | c.1866+13A>G | NM_016835.4 | rs63750308 |
| MAPT | Chr17:44087782 | c.1866+14C>T | NM_016835.4 | rs63750972 |
| MAPT | Chr17:44087783 | c.1866+15A>C | NM_016835.4 | |
| MAPT | Chr17:44087784 | c.1866+16C>T | NM_016835.4 | rs63751011 |
| MAPT | Chr17:44087787 | c.1866+19C>G | NM_016835.4 | rs63750162 |
| PSEN1 | Chr14:73673071 | c.869-23_869-22insTGGAATTTTGTGCTGTTG | NM_000021.3 | |
| SIGMAR1 | Chr9:34635578 | c.*51G>T | NM_005866.2 | rs768783740 |
| SNCA | Chr4:90647315 | c.*464C>A | NM_000345.3 | rs183204610 |
| TARDBP | Chr1:11082794 | c.*83T>C | NM_007375.3 | rs80356744 |
| TARDBP | Chr1:11083408 | c.*697G>A | NM_007375.3 | rs387906334 |
| VCP | Chr9:35072710 | c.-360G>C | NM_007126.3 |
Test Strengths
The strengths of this test include:
- CAP accredited laboratory
- CLIA-certified personnel performing clinical testing in a CLIA-certified laboratory
- Powerful sequencing technologies, advanced target enrichment methods and precision bioinformatics pipelines ensure superior analytical performance
- Careful construction of clinically effective and scientifically justified gene panels
- Some of the panels include the whole mitochondrial genome (please see the Panel Content section)
- Our Nucleus online portal providing transparent and easy access to quality and performance data at the patient level
- ~2,000 non-coding disease causing variants in our clinical grade NGS assay for panels (please see ‘Non-coding disease causing variants covered by this panel’ in the Panel Content section)
- Our rigorous variant classification scheme
- Our systematic clinical interpretation workflow using proprietary software enabling accurate and traceable processing of NGS data
- Our comprehensive clinical statements
Test Limitations
Genes with partial, or whole gene, segmental duplications in the human genome are marked with an asterisk (*) if they overlap with the UCSC pseudogene regions. The technology may have limited sensitivity to detect variants in genes marked with these symbols (please see the Panel content table above).
The APOE E4 allele is reported if and when it is identified in the homozygous state.
Effective October 2025: APOE E4 allele is reported if and when it is identified in the heterozygous state.
APOE E2 or E3 status (homozygous or heterozygous) is not associated with dementia and is not reported.
The APOE E4 allele has a frequency of 14% in the general population. The odds ratio (OR) of developing Alzheimer disease with a single heterozygous APOE E4 allele is 3.68 (95% CI 3.30-4.11), compared to 14.49 (95% CI 11.91-17.64) for those individuals who are homozygous for the APOE E4 allele1. Highly penetrant variants typically have an OR that is higher than 32; the APOE E4 allele alone is not sufficient to cause Alzheimer disease.
APOE E2 or E3 status (homozygous or heterozygous) is not associated with dementia and is not reported if identified in patients tested with this panel for a dementia indication.
1. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al; ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405-24. doi:10.1038/gim.2015.30
2. Yamazaki Y, Zhao N, Caulfield TR, Liu CC, Bu G. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease: pathobiology and targeting strategies. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15(9):501-518. doi:10.1038/s41582-019-0228-7
This test does not detect the following:
- Complex inversions
- Gene conversions
- Balanced translocations
- Some of the panels include the whole mitochondrial genome but not all (please see the Panel Content section)
- Repeat expansion disorders unless specifically mentioned
- Non-coding variants deeper than ±20 base pairs from exon-intron boundary unless otherwise indicated (please see above Panel Content / non-coding variants covered by the panel).
This test may not reliably detect the following:
- Low level mosaicism in nuclear genes (variant with a minor allele fraction of 14.6% is detected with 90% probability)
- Stretches of mononucleotide repeats
- Low level heteroplasmy in mtDNA (>90% are detected at 5% level)
- Indels larger than 50bp
- Single exon deletions or duplications
- Variants within pseudogene regions/duplicated segments
- Some disease causing variants present in mtDNA are not detectable from blood, thus post-mitotic tissue such as skeletal muscle may be required for establishing molecular diagnosis.
The sensitivity of this test may be reduced if DNA is extracted by a laboratory other than Blueprint Genetics.
For additional information, please refer to the Test performance section.
The genes on the panels have been carefully selected based on scientific literature, mutation databases, and our experience.
The panels are sectioned from our high-quality, clinical grade NGS assay. The panel analysis includes a combination of both sequence variants (single nucleotide variants (SNV’s) and indels) as well as deletions and duplications (copy number variants (CNV)).
Please refer to the table below for performance metrics of the analytical validation of the assay. The validation includes the evaluation of reference samples to determine the capability of the assay to detect various types of variants. The sensitivity values quoted in the analytic validation may not precisely reflect the performance in a production setting and is not a guarantee of the assay’s clinical performance. The provided performance metrics are based on a validation conducted at our laboratory in Finland. The assay has been validated for various sample types including EDTA-blood, isolated DNA (excluding from formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue), saliva, and dried blood spots (filter paper cards).
Performance of Blueprint Genetics high-quality, clinical grade NGS sequencing assay for panels.
Analytical sensitivity to detect single-nucleotide variants and indels were calculated using both versions v3.3.2 and v4.2.1 of high-confidence region benchmark data provided by Genome in a Bottle (GIAB) consortium. Version 4.2.1 is extended to include challenging medically relevant regions and other difficult to map regions. Version 4.2.1 covers 94.1% of reference (GRCh37) and v3.3.2 covers 87.8% of reference. For more information, see GIAB publication https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xgen.2022.100128.
| Sensitivity % (TP/(TP+FN) | Specificity % | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GIAB Version 3.3.2 | GIAB Version 4.2.1 | GIAB Version 3.3.2 | GIAB Version 4.2.1 | |
| Single nucleotide variants | 99.57 % | 97.58 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Insertions, deletions | ||||
| 1-10 bps | 95.38 % | 95.13 % | 100.00 % | 100.00 % |
| 11-20 bps | 99.09 % | 98.15 % | 100.00 % | 100.00 % |
| 21-50 bps | 98.78 % | 98.85 % | 100.00 % | 100.00 % |
| 2-50 bps | 97.62 % | 97.41 % | 100.00 % | 100.00 % |
| Copy number variants (exon level dels/dups, clinical sample performance) | Sensitivity | Specificity | ||
| 1 exon level deletion (heterozygous) | 100% (14/14) | NA | ||
| 1 exon deletion (homozygous or hemizygous) | 100% (5/5) | NA | ||
| 2-4 exon deletion (heterozygous or homozygous) | 100% (17/17) | NA | ||
| 5-33 exon deletion (heterozygous) | 100% (12/12) | NA | ||
| 1-5 exon duplication (heterozygous or homozygous) | 77% (10/13) | NA | ||
| 9-31 exon duplication (heterozygous) | 100% (7/7) | NA | ||
| Simulated CNV detection in reference samples (n=10) | Sensitivity | |||
| 5 exon level deletion/duplication | 98 % | |||
| Microdeletion/-duplication syndromes (large CNVs, n=22)) | ||||
| Size range (0.1-47 Mb) | 100% (22/22) | |||
| The performance presented above was reached by Blueprint Genetics high-quality, clinical grade NGS sequencing assay with the following coverage metrics | ||||
| Average of median sequencing depths in reference samples | 136x | |||
| Nucleotides with >20x sequencing coverage (%) | 99.77% | |||
Performance of Blueprint Genetics Mitochondrial Sequencing Assay.
| ANALYTIC VALIDATION (reference samples; n=4) | Sensitivity % | |||
| Single nucleotide variants | ||||
| Heteroplasmic (45-100%) | 100.0% (50/50) | |||
| Heteroplasmic (35-45%) | 100.0% (87/87) | |||
| Heteroplasmic (25-35%) | 100.0% (73/73) | |||
| Heteroplasmic (15-25%) | 100.0% (74/74) | |||
| Heteroplasmic (5-15%) | 100.0% (79/79) | |||
| Heteroplasmic (<5%) | 53.3 % (8/15) | |||
| CLINICAL VALIDATION (n=20 samples) | ||||
| Single nucleotide variants (n=18 SNVs) | 100.0% (3/3) | |||
| Heteroplasmic (10-15%) | 100.0% (5/5) | |||
| Heteroplasmic (5-10%) | 100.0% (5/5) | |||
| Heteroplasmic (<5%) | 20% (1/5) | |||
| Insertions and deletions by sequence analysis (n=3) | ||||
| Heteroplasmic (45-100%) 1-10bp | 100.0% (3/3) | |||
| Validation of the mitochondrial genome analysis workflow (based on simulated data of pathogenic mitomap mutations) | ||||
| Insertions and deletions 1-24 bps by sequence analysis; n=17 | ||||
| Homoplasmic (100%) 1-24bp | 100.0% (17/17) | |||
| Heteroplasmic (50%) | 100.0% (17/17) | |||
| Heteroplasmic (25%) | 100.0% (17/17) | |||
| Heteroplasmic (20%) | 100.0% (17/17) | |||
| Heteroplasmic (15%) | 100.0% (17/17) | |||
| Heteroplasmic (10%) | 94.1% (16/17) | |||
| Heteroplasmic (5%) | 94.1% (16/17) | |||
| Copy number variants (separate artifical mutations; n=1500) | ||||
| Homoplasmic (100%) 500 bp, 1kb, 5 kb | 100.0% | |||
| Heteroplasmic (50%) 500 bp, 1kb, 5 kb | 100.0% | |||
| Heteroplasmic (30%) 500 bp, 1kb, 5 kb | 100.0% | |||
| Heteroplasmic (20%) 500 bp, 1kb, 5 kb | 99.7% | |||
| Heteroplasmic (10%) 500 bp, 1kb, 5 kb | 99.0% | |||
| Following mtDNA coverage metrics were obtained in clinical samples in the assay validation (n=238) | ||||
| Mean of medians | ||||
| Mean sequencing depth MQ0 | 6334x | |||
| Nucleotides with >1000x MQ0 sequencing coverage (%) | 100% | |||
| rho zero cell line (=no mtDNA), mean sequencing depth in mitochondrial assay validation | 12X | |||
The target region for each gene includes coding exons and ±20 base pairs from the exon-intron boundary. In addition, the panel includes non-coding and regulatory variants if listed above (Non-coding variants covered by the panel). Some regions of the gene(s) may be removed from the panel if specifically mentioned in the ‘Test limitations” section above. If the test includes the mitochondrial genome the target region gene list contains the mitochondrial genes. The sequencing data generated in our laboratory is analyzed with our proprietary data analysis and annotation pipeline, integrating state-of-the art algorithms and industry-standard software solutions. Incorporation of rigorous quality control steps throughout the workflow of the pipeline ensures the consistency, validity and accuracy of results. Our pipeline is streamlined to maximize sensitivity without sacrificing specificity. We have incorporated a number of reference population databases and mutation databases including, but not limited, to 1000 Genomes Project, gnomAD, ClinVar and HGMD into our clinical interpretation software to make the process effective and efficient. For missense variants, in silico variant prediction tools such as SIFT, PolyPhen,MutationTaster are used to assist with variant classification. Through our online ordering and statement reporting system, Nucleus, ordering providers have access to the details of the analysis, including patient specific sequencing metrics, a gene level coverage plot and a list of regions with suboptimal coverage (<20X for nuclear genes and <1000X for mtDNA) if applicable. This reflects our mission to build fully transparent diagnostics where ordering providers can easily visualize the crucial details of the analysis process.
We provide customers with comprehensive clinical report available on the market. Clinical interpretation requires a fundamental understanding of clinical genetics and genetic principles. At Blueprint Genetics, our Ph.D. molecular geneticists, medical professionals, and other highly experienced experts prepare clinical reports by evaluating the identified variants in the context of the phenotypic information provided in the requisition form.
Our goal is to provide clinically meaningful reports that are understandable for all medical professionals regardless of whether they have formal training in genetics. Variant classification is the cornerstone of clinical interpretation and resulting patient management decisions. Our classifications follow the ACMG guideline 2015. Sequence and copy number variants classified as pathogenic, likely pathogenic, and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are confirmed using bidirectional Sanger sequencing or by orthogonal methods such as qPCR/ddPCR when they do not meet our stringent NGS quality metrics for a true positive call.
Our clinical report includes tables for sequence and copy number variants that include basic variant information (genomic coordinates, HGVS nomenclature, zygosity, allele frequencies, in silico predictions, phenotypes, and classification of the variant). In addition, the statement includes detailed descriptions of the variant, gene, and phenotype(s), including the role of the specific gene in human disease, the mutation profile, information about the gene’s variation in population cohorts, and detailed information about related phenotypes. We also provide links to the references, abstracts, and variant databases used to help ordering providers further evaluate the reported findings if desired.
The panel report is divided into primary findings and additional findings sections. Variants reported as primary findings are known disease-causing variants or rare variants that could potentially explain the patient’s phenotype as described to the laboratory at the time of interpretation. The conclusion summarizes all the existing information and provides our rationale for the classification of the variant.
Variants reported as additional findings are variants that are not likely or sufficient to cause the tested patient’s phenotype, based on the current knowledge. Additional findings in panel reports include variants that are, for example, carrierships of single heterozygous variants in genes associated with autosomal recessive disorders, variants of uncertain significance in genes associated with autosomal dominant disorders (if pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants considered sufficient to explain the patient’s phenotype are reported as primary findings), or risk alleles identified in genes included in the panel.
Identification of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in dominant disorders or their combinations in different alleles in recessive disorders are considered molecular confirmation of the clinical diagnosis. In these cases, family member testing can be used for risk stratification. We do not recommend using variants of uncertain significance (VUS) for family member risk stratification or patient management. Genetic counseling is recommended.
Our interpretation team analyzes millions of variants from thousands of individuals with rare diseases. Our internal database and our understanding of variants and related phenotypes increases with every case analyzed. Our laboratory is therefore well positioned to reclassify previously reported variants as new information becomes available. If a variant previously reported as a primary or secondary finding by Blueprint Genetics is reclassified so that it becomes diagnostic (VUS to P/LP) or earlier molecular diagnosis is removed (P/LP to VUS, LB, B), our laboratory will issue a follow-up statement to the original ordering healthcare provider at no additional cost.
Other
- Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration
- Dementia
- Dementia Advocacy and Support Network
- Dyer SM et al. Clinicalpractice guidelinesand principles of care for people withdementiain Australia. Aust Fam Physician. 2016 Dec;45(12):884-889.
- Frontotemporal Dementia Support Group
- Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Association
- Rosness TA et al. FrontotemporalDementia: An Updated Clinician's Guide. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2016 Sep;29(5):271-80.